The Lord JESUS CHRIST versus Muhammad
A comparison of Muhammad and the Lord Jesus Christ, the Qur'an and the Bible; who the Lord Jesus is and what He did, their basic respective messages of salvation, and means of spreading such faith
Does the Qur'an agree with the Bible, or is it proven to contradict the very book it supposedly is an extension of, especially concerning Who Christ was and What He Did? Did Muhammad preach the same gospel as Christ and His apostles, and did he promote the same means of “warfare?” And is Islam a religion of peace or violence? What does the Bible say about the Lord Jesus Christ, and what did He say concerning these things? This issue is a cause of much controversy today, yet sadly very few seem to be willingly to carefully examine what both original sources declare on such subjects. It is indeed of critical importance to know what the overall statements of both are, as it relates not only to the present days conflicts, but above all to ones eternal destiny.
This study somewhat briefly reveals that both the god of Islam and it's salvation are clearly contrary to the Author of the Jewish and Christian scriptures, which scriptures it much depends upon — and being the prior revelation (which Muhammad acknowledged), it must agree with — and thus it cannot be of God.
In essence, absolute holiness and perfect justice of Almighty God is made clear by His Word, as is the absolute necessity of trusting in the Lord Jesus Christ for salvation, as the only perfectly holy Divine Son of God, who satisfied justice in His death on the cross, and rose to glory as mans present Savior and future judge! Muhammad, coming over 600 years after the fact, denies of both the Biblical Christ and His work of redemption, and instead substitutes his message of salvation through submission to Islam, which supposes man may merit Paradise, and that God forgives without satisfying the justice due us for our sins, which He did in the person of Jesus Christ.
This study will be divided into sections, comparing what the Bible says versus that of the Qur'an. Bible references should show when your mouse is placed over them, while references from the Qur'an, from three translations, can be seen here. It should be understood that references herein to other sites does not infer that I agree with everything that such a site may teach.
|
The identity of the LORD Jesus |
|
|
Muhammad's belief in the Bible |
|
|
Charges of textual corruption |
|
|
Warfare and treatment of enemies |
|
|
Salvation and the Afterlife |
|
|
Summary |
|
|
The Eternal Choice which must be made |
|
A compilation of many of the clear statements concerning who the Lord Jesus is and and what did, and His commands given by the Holy Spirit of GOD concerning salvation, and the conduct of Christians towards each other, and the lost, and to enemies, and the secular government
|
The Biblical identity of the Lord Jesus (see also here) and His mission |
Death and Resurrection proclaimed; the central facts of the gospel |
Muhammad's denial of both Christ's identity and His gospel |
Commentary |
|
Whom do men say that I the Son of man am? And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets. He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. Matthew 16:13-17 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God... And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. "But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed. {6} All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the LORD hath laid on him the iniquity of us all." Isaiah 53:5-6 For God so loved the world, that he gave His only begotten [very own, unique, one of a kind; uncreated] Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not His Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through Him might be saved. He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. Jn. 1:1, 14; 3:16, 17, 36 Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation [final, complete and perfect payment] for our sins. And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory. 1Tim. 3:16 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation. 2Cor. 5:19. See also God, Heb 1:1-3,7-13 The Holy Spirit next expressly warns of “another gospel,” that contradicts the true Gospel: But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. Gal. 1:6-9; cf. 2Cor. 11:1-4, 13-15 |
For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures [as predicted: Is. 53]; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures: And that he was seen of Cephas, then of the twelve: After that, he was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; of whom the greater part remain unto this present, but some are fallen asleep. 1Cor 15:3-6 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain: Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death: because it was not possible that He should be held by it. This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses. Acts 2:23, 24, 32 Who did no sin, neither was guile found in His mouth: Who His own self bare our sins in His own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed. For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit: Who is gone into heaven, and is on the right hand of God; angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto Him. 1Pt. 2:22, 24, 3:18, 22 For He (God the Father) hath made Him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him. 2Cor. 5:21 The basic gospel message that the original apostles (approx. 35-90 AD.) preached: Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that GOD is no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with Him. The word which GOD sent unto the children of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ: (He is Lord of all:) That word, I say, ye know, which was published throughout all Judaea, and began from Galilee, after the baptism which John preached; How GOD anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power: who went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the devil; for GOD was with him. And we are witnesses of all things which he did both in the land of the Jews, and in Jerusalem; whom they slew and hanged on a tree: Him GOD raised up the third day, and shewed him openly; Not to all the people, but unto witnesses chosen before of GOD, even to us, who did eat and drink with him after he rose from the dead. And he commanded us to preach unto the people, and to testify that it is he which was ordained of GOD to be the Judge of quick and dead. To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins. Acts 10:34-43 |
They do blaspheme who say: "Allah is Christ the son of Mary." But said Christ: "O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode. There will for the wrong-doers be no one to help. 5:72 (Yusufali) They surely disbelieve [are infidels] who say: Lo! Allah is the third of three; when there is no Allah save the One Allah. If they desist not from so saying a painful doom will fall on those of them who disbelieve. 5:73 (Pickthal) The Messiah, son of Mary, was no other than a messenger, messengers (the like of whom) had passed away before him. 5:75a (Pickthal) ...Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) a messenger of Allah, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him: so believe in Allah and His messengers. Say not "Trinity"... 4:171 (Yusufali) That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:- 4:157-56 (Yusufali) |
Comparison of the Qur'an with the Bible shows that the Qur'an clearly contradicts it, denying both the Divine nature of Christ and that He died for our sins and rose again. However, many times Muhammad affirmed the Law, and the Gospels as true and authoritative. Later, in response to the evident contradictions, Islam taught that the Bible was changed to say things which the Qur'an and Islam denies. However, such a change would require an almost complete rewriting of the entire New Testament, and substantial changes of the Old, neither of which suppositions the abundant manuscript evidence, experiential proofs, or logic will support in the light of the facts. Not one of the thousands of partial or full Biblical manuscripts that have been found (including those which predate Mohammad) support the contradictions found in the Qur'an! See below for additional information on this. Much supernatural cause-effect evidence also testifies to the resurrection power of Jesus Christ. Since Muhammad appeals to the Bible as a verifying source of Truth, how can Islam now say the Bible was altered to declare the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus, the Son of GOD, when abundant Biblical manuscript evidence from before the time of Muhammad exists, all of which testifies to the claims of CHRIST as being the Divine Son of GOD, and that He died for our sins and rose again to glory, as Savior and Judge? There simply is no real evidence to support these claims of Islam. (See Lk.1:1-4; Acts 1:1-11; 10:34-44; 1Cor.15:1-7; 1Pet. 2:24; 3:18-22). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Muhammad's belief in the Bible
|
|||
|
Charges of textual corruption Islamic apologists recognize the clear and abundant contradictions between the Qur'an and the Bible, and therefore charge that the Bible was tampered with, invoking Surah 2:78-79 which speaks of "illiterates, who know not the Book....who write the Book with their own hands." Christian apologists respond to these charges by pointing out that the Qur'an itself affirms the integrity of The Book, thus if corruption occurred then it would be in contradiction to the Qur'an itself, and its doctrine of the preservation of Divine revelation. In addition, the amount of alterations required to explain the Quranic deviations from Biblical text would require a significant amount of changes to the Old Testament and virtually a complete rewriting of the New, yet for such a project there is no manuscript evidence, but the contrary exists for its preservation from such changes. Christian apologists note that an abundance of manuscripts which predate the Quran yet exist,1 such as the Codex Sinaiticus (c. 350 AD), with Aland numbering a total of 230 extant New Testament manuscript portions which pre-date 600 AD (192 Greek New Testament manuscripts, 5 Greek lectionaries containing scripture, and 33 translations of the Greek New Testament). (Kurt and Barbara Aland, 1987:82-83)2 The doctrinal agreement of these with later manuscripts manifest that no such manner of alterations or rewriting took place. 3 4 In addition, it is postulated that if Muhammad could not read, as Islam states, then he would have relied upon the word of others (travelers, etc.) who were overall likely to be significantly Biblically illiterate.5 This would explain how Muhammad could reprove such things as the Christian Trinity consisting of God, Jesus and Mary,6 (Sura 5:116-117) in addition to speaking numerous contradictions of the Bible. In response, Muslim apologists seek to make a case against a reliable Bible based upon the lack of a universal canon among all Christian churches, or early incomplete manuscripts, or additions to them (''the Epistle of Barnabas'', and portions of ''The Shepherd of Hermas'' to Codex Sinaiticus), as well a relatively small degree of actual (beyond spelling, etc.) textual disagreement 7 among some of the thousands of existing manuscripts. However, none of these aspects provides a solution to the Islamic problem, as none of the manuscripts substantiate the Qur'anic deviations, nor does the small percentage (contrary to typical Muslim exaggeration) of actual variants among manuscripts support the manner of massive changes which the Islamic solution requires. Moreover, the Qur'an, for which there is no manuscripts evidence for over 100 years after it was said to be given,8 evidences its own problematic texts,9 even though it is a far smaller (in size and scope) book, and one that was written after durable writing materials came into use, and then underwent a purification process in which variant manuscripts were burned.10 The conclusion is that “manuscript, as well as documentary and archaeological evidence indicates that much of what the Qur'an maintains does not coincide with the historical data at our disposal which comes from that period.”11 Some assert that the predominant religion after the 4th century, that of Roman Catholicism, changed the Bible. However, apart from the practical difficulties this assertion faces, if that was their case then Catholicism did a very poor job as the Bible (which they once forbade the public to read) soundly reproves the aberrations of Christianity (from praying to departed saints to the perpetual virginity of Mary to the perpetuated Petrine papacy, which the Roman church has historically manifested. (Mt. 15:1-14; 24; 2Cor.11:1-4, 12-15; Gal.1:6-9; etc.]. Thus it is seen that it is the Qur'an that has changed what God revealed in the Bible, while seeking to use the Bible as a basis of authority. In addition, although Muslims also typically claim that the text of the Qur'an is identical to that received by Muhammad, Christian researchers contend that there is overwhelming evidence that it is not.12 As no extant Biblical manuscript, from before the time of Muhammad or after him, agrees with the Quranic contradictions, many Muslim apologists look to the so-called Gospel of Barnabas for support. However, this radically different account is judged by both Christian and secular academics (and even some Muslims such as Abbas el-Akkad) to be a late work and pseudepigraphical. With its obvious anachronisms and historical errors (like sailing to Nazareth) and utter lack of early manuscript evidence and irreconcilable differences between it and any ancient manuscripts, it is manifest to be a fourteenth century attempt to read later Islamic doctrine into the Bible, which clearly refutes it.13, 14 15 16 |
|||
|
Warfare and treatment of enemies As regards the means of spreading and defending the faith, as Muhammad did in-deed promote “Jihad” and retaliation by physical force and blood shed, then it is to be expected that a true Qur'an-believing Muslim would seek to practice physical violence and brutality in retaliation against enemies and in seeking to establish submission to his god Allah. Conversely, in the true light of the Biblical Gospel of CHRIST, it would wrong for a true Bible-believing Christian to use physical violence or such coercion (as was used in the Inquisitions) in bringing souls to obey the Lord JESUS CHRIST, or to defend the faith. Instead, having been "born from above," the believer need not and must not use the sword of men to enlarge of defend the spiritual Kingdom of the Lord Jesus in this age of grace, but as their real enemies are spiritual, they are to use decidedly spiritual means: prayer and the Sword of the Spirit, the Word of God (Eph. 6:10-18), and by such, and with compassion, seek to persuade souls by the manifestation of the Truth. (2Cor. 4:2) Before the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus, physical religious violence was ordained by God in the Old Testament within the context of a physical kingdom, and was instituted with and often accompanied by unmistakable supernatural attestation of God (Ex. 7:20-12:30; 14:21-31; Lev. 10:1, 2; Num. 11:1-3 ;16:32 Josh. 10:12-14 ; Ps. 105;106). Under the New Covenant, promised by the prophet Jeremiah, (Jer. 33:31-34), and instituted at Jesus death, (Lk. 22:20; Heb. 9:16) the kingdom of God is a spiritual one (thus to enter into it you must be born of the Spirit: Jn.3:3-7), and the means by which it wages “war” are essentially spiritual. While things such as the Roman Catholic Crusades and Inquisitions are often invoked by both Muslim apologists and atheists as evidence of the violent nature of Christianity, the New Covenant neither supports the church using physical violence or its force in order to subdue its spiritual enemies, including retaliation, or to constrain acceptance of Christ, or otherwise rule over those without. Nor did the church even use such in church discipline. (Mt. 5:13, 14; 12:15-17; Eph. 6:12; 2 Cor. 6:1-10; 10:3-6; 1 Cor. 5:12,13) Instead, Jesus Christ has constructed the church in such a way that it must rely upon spiritual power and means, in order to truly represent Him and bring God's will to be done on earth as it is in Heaven. Rather than the use of religious violence being a characteristic of Christian groups which take the Bible to be their ultimate authority, more often such go to what some consider extremes of pacifism, while things as the Crusades and Inquisitions or the Mormon's Utah War are a result of a man or organization being exalted above the Bible, and fostering critical ignorance or misconstruance of its teachings. The just use of force by the established civil government is sanctioned under the New Covenant, (Rm. 13:1-5; 1Pet. 2:13-15) and Christians may sometimes by employed in so doing, yet the only time Christians may engage in “religious killing” is by purely supernatural means. (Acts 5:1-12; Jude 1:14,15; Rev. 19:14,15) It should also be noted that, at less than 80,000 words, (figures vary, but 77,439 by ‘Ata bin Yasar), the Qur'an is much smaller than the Bible. (about 602,585 words in the Old Testament and 80,552 in the New = 783,037, with the total words in just the verses in the King James Version being counted at 788,258). The Qur'an is also far more restrictive in its scope of communication, (http://www.bible.ca/islam/library/Gilchrist/Vol1/4a.html; http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Menj/bravo_r4bc.htm) lacking the manner of extensive historical narratives of the Bible, and the superior context it provides for its commands, including means and conditions of warfare, as well as genealogical records which helps provide historical chronology. In addition, absent from the Quran are extended doctrinal discourses on salvation, especially such as are seen in the New Testament. This results in difficultly formulating broad systematic theology out of the Qur'an by itself, and its allusions to Biblical characters and events evidences that it requires knowledge of the Bible, which as the prior revelation, it must agree with.
|
|||||||||
Muhammad was not without some knowledge of the Bible (which was already well established by Muhammad's time), which is reflected in his reiterating certain Biblical texts and allusions to certain Biblical events and concepts .
But Muhammad invariably not only skews the historical events of the Bible (he likely received many of his versions of Biblical stores from Biblically illiterate traders, etc., or other unreliable sources), but also produces an admixture of the fleshly paganism (sensual soft-eyed reclining virgins in a Muslim Paradise, waiting for their men to copulate with, etc.). along with his own peculiar visions.
Islam attempts to explain the great disparity between the Bible and the Qur'an by saying that the Bible has been altered whenever a contradiction exists between the two. Such an assertion is simply and truly in-credible, as among the many thousands of extant Biblical manuscripts there does not exist even one that agrees with Islam's claims concerning such things as it's Biblically disparate historical accounts. Meanwhile, the Qur'an's contradictions of the New Testament are so immense that it would require a near complete rewriting to concur with the Qur'an. Just the identity and mission of Christ alone, and His death and resurrection are so well established in the New Testament and so inextricably central to it's message that it is impossible to simply change it. Meanwhile, an abundance of Biblical manuscripts antedate the Qur'an, showing that the Bible that people read during the time of Muhammad – and which he called people to examine him by (apparently being largely ignorant of it) – is the same one that exists today.
Man without the Holy Spirit works to make a distorted image of GOD. In Muhammad's case it is a distant and impersonal deity, and one who cannot condescend to mans estate in order manifest himself nor redeem man, but who instead communicated a form of morality and theology through a monologue with Muhammad. Although in some respects this was superior to the polytheism of his day – insofar as it's morality and theology was closer to the Bible which Muhammad often drew from – it misconstrued both the revelation of God and His will, and reveals a god made in the image of man, rather than the wholly Holy, and perfectly Just, yet sacrificially Merciful and ultimately Benevolent Almighty GOD of Abraham!
The True and Living God neither abrogated his Holiness nor Justice in reconciling sinful, Hell-bound man to Himself. God's absolute holiness disallows that man can ever merit Paradise on the basis of His own deeds, nor escape Hell by the same, and the Lord's perfect justice precludes that man can be reconciled to God without a perfect atonement. Only in the cross of Christ is justice satisfied, and forgiveness and reconciliation enabling man.
“To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation” (2Cor. 5:19). " For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:" (1Pt.3:18). “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory” (1Tim. 3:16).
The Lord thus proclaims, "this is My beloved Son, in Whom I am well pleased; hear ye Him." He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of GOD abideth on him" (Mt.17:5; Jn.3:36).
Will you do that today, or will you sin away your day of grace and wake up in Hell, to your own eternal horror?! “How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation.” “Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out ...” “That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved” (Heb. 2:3; Acts 3:19; Rm. 10:9).
This decision is shown by being baptized under water in identification with your Lord, and then following Him with a Bible – believing and preaching evangelical church.
There is much more i could add on this subject, “but these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name. (John 20:31)
That is the simple, yet eternal truth and plea. May you who hear receive it for your eternal souls sake, to the glory of the True and Living God!
The Eternal Choice which must be made
The constant call in the Bible is to choose God over sin and be saved, by “the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.” (Gal. 2:20)
“In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace;” (Col. 1:13)
"Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out." "That if thou shall confess thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shall believe that GOD hath raised Him from the dead, thou shalt be saved" "
“For whosoever shall call upon the Name of the Lord shall be saved" (2Ths. 1:8,9; Rom. 10:9, 13
“If GOD "spared not His own Son (having the same eternal nature), but delivered Him up for us all," "How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation? (Rm.10:9,13;. 8:32; Heb.2:3)
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me. To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice (Jn. 14:6; 18:27).
“Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth My word, and believeth on Him that sent Me, hath everlasting life, and shall, not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life. (Jn. 5:24)
++++++++++++++++++
“O give thanks unto the Lord for He is good; for His mercy for ever” (Ps. 107:1)!
For additional evidence relating to Muhammad's exhortation to violence and other issues, see
http://bibleprobe.com/mohammed.htm
http://www.muhammadanism.org/Muhammad/Muhammad_Terrorism.htm
http://www.studytoanswer.net/islam_myths.html
http://www.answering-islam.org/Authors/Arlandson/ten_reasons.htm
http://www.answering-islam.org/Green/compare.htm
Also see their home page, http://www.answering-islam.org
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles.htm
http://debate.org.uk/topics/apolog/contrads.htm
Home page: www.peacebyjesus.com